ALTE DOCUMENTE |
THE SELENKA EXPEDITION
To
resolve some of the questions surrounding the Pithecanthropus fossils and their
discovery, Emil Selenka, professor of zoology at
Furthermore, in 1924 George Grant MacCurdy, a Yale professor of anthropology, wrote in his book Human Origins: "The Selenka expedition of 1907- 1908 ... secured a tooth which is said by Walkoff to be definitely human. It is a third molar from a neighboring stream bed and from deposits older (Pliocene) than those in which Pithecanthropus erectus was found."
DUBOIS
WITHDRAWS FROM THE
Meanwhile, the status of Dubois's ape-man remained controversial. Surveying the range of opinion about Pithecanthropus, Berlin zoologist Wilhelm Dames gathered statements from several scientists: three said Pithecanthropus was an ape, five said it was human, six said it was an ape-man, six said it was a missing link, and two said it was a link between the missing link and man.
But while
many scientists maintained their doubts, others followed Haeckel in hailing
Java man as stunning proof of
At a certain point, Dubois became completely disappointed with the mixed reception the scientific community gave to his Pithecanthropus. He stopped showing his specimens. Some say that he kept them for some time beneath the floorboards in his home. In any case, they remained hidden from view for some 25 years, until 1932.
During
and after the period of withdrawal, the controversies concerning
Pithecanthropus continued. Marcellin Boule, director of the
MORE FEMURS
The
belated revelation that more femurs had been discovered in Java further
complicated the issue. In 1932, Dr. Bernsen and Eugene Dubois recovered three
femurs from a box of fossil mammalian bones in the
Dubois
stated that he was not present when the femurs were taken out by Kriele.
Therefore the exact location of the femurs in the excavation, which was 75
meters (246 feet) long by 6-14 meters (20-46 feet) wide, was unknown to him.
According to standard paleontological procedures, this uncertainty greatly reduces
the value of the bones as evidence of any sort. Nevertheless, authorities later
assigned these femurs to a particular stratum without mentioning the dubious
circumstances of their discovery in boxes of fossils over 30 years after they
were originally excavated. In addition to the three femurs found by Kriele, two
more femoral fragments turned up in the
The existence of the additional femurs has important implications for the original Pithecanthropus skull and femur found by Dubois in the 1890s. The apelike skull and humanlike femur were found at a great distance from each other, but Dubois assigned them to the same creature. He suggested that the bones were found separated because Pithecanthropus had been dismembered by a crocodile. But if you throw in more humanlike femurs, that argument loses a great deal of its force. Where were the other skulls? Were they apelike skulls, like the one found? And what about the skull that was found? Does it really go with the femur that was found 45 feet away ? Or does it belong with one of the other femurs that later turned up? Or maybe with a femur of an entirely different sort?
ARE THE TRINIL FEMURS MODERN HUMAN?
In 1973,
M. H. Day and T. I. Molleson concluded that "the gross anatomy, radiological
[X-ray] anatomy, and microscopical anatomy of the Trinil femora does not distinguish them significantly from modern human
femora." They also said that Homo erectus femurs from
In 1984,
Richard Leakey and other scientists discovered an almost complete skeleton of
Homo erectus in
About the
Java discoveries, the scientists stated: "From
In summary, modern researchers say the Trinil femurs are not like those of Homo erectus but are instead like those of modern Homo sapiens. What is to be made of these revelations? The Java thighbones have traditionally been taken as evidence of an ape-man (Pithecanthropus erectus, now called Homo erectus) existing around 800,000 years ago in the Middle Pleistocene. Now it appears we can accept them as evidence for anatomically modern humans existing 800,000 years ago.
Some have said that the femurs were mixed in from higher levels. Of course, if one insists that the humanlike Trinil femurs were mixed in from higher levels, then why not the Pithecanthropus skull as well? That would eliminate entirely the original Java man find, long advertised as solid proof of human evolution.
Indeed, late in his life Eugene Dubois himself concluded that the skullcap of his beloved Pithecanthropus belonged to a large gibbon, an ape not thought by evolutionists to be closely related to humans. But the heretofore skeptical scientific community was not about to say good-bye to Java man, for by this time Pithecanthropus was firmly entrenched in the ancestry of modern Homo sapiens. Dubois's denials were dismissed as the whims of a cantankerous old man. If anything, the scientific community wanted to remove any remaining doubts about the nature and authenticity of Java man. This, it was hoped, would fortify the whole concept of Darwinian evolution, of which human evolution was the most highly publicized and controversial aspect.
Visitors
to museums around the world still find models of the Trinil skullcap and femur
portrayed as belonging to the same Middle Pleistocene Homo erectus individual.
In 1984, the much-advertised Ancestors exhibit, at the
|