WHO MADE THE EOLITHIC IMPLEMENTS?
Even
after having heard all of the arguments for eoliths being of human manufacture,
arguments which will certainly prove convincing to
many, some might still legitimately maintain a degree of doubt. Could such a
person, it might be asked, be forgi 555t1924f ven for not accepting the eoliths? The
answer to that question is a qualified yes. The qualification is that one
should then reject other stone tool industries of a similar nature. This would
mean rejecting many accepted industries, including the Oldowan
industries of
The most
reasonable conclusion is that both the European eoliths and the Oldowan tools of
But there
is another possibility. Mary Leakey said this in her book about the Oldowan stone tools: "An interesting present-day
example of unretouched flakes used as cutting tools
has recently been recorded in
The standard reply will be that there are no fossils showing that humans of the fully modern type were around then, in the Early Pleistocene or Late Pliocene, roughly 1 -2 million years ago, whereas there are fossils of Homo habilis. But Homo sapiens fossils are quite rare even at Late Pleistocene sites where there are lots of stone tools and other signs of human habitation.
Furthermore,
as described in Chapters 7 and 12, fossil skeletal remains of human beings of
the fully modern type have been discovered by scientists in strata at least as
old as the lower levels of
It is,
therefore, not correct to say that there is no fossil evidence whatsoever for a
fully human presence in the lower levels of
"In general appearance," she wrote, "the circle resembles temporary structures often made by present-day nomadic peoples who build a low stone wall round their dwellings to serve either as a windbreak or as a base to support upright branches which are bent over and covered with either skins or grassy For illustration, Mary Leakey provided a photograph of such a temporary shelter made by the Okombambi tribe of South West Africa (now Namibia).
Not everyone agreed with Leakey's interpretation of the stone circle. But accepting Leakey's version, the obvious question may be raised: if she believed the structure resembled those made by present-day nomadic peoples like the Okombambi, then why could she not assume that anatomically modern humans made the Olduvai stone circle 1.75 million years ago?
Interestingly
enough, there is evidence that some of the tools from
Louis and
Mary Leakey also found in Bed I of
So where does this leave us? In today' s world, we find that humans manufacture stone tools of various levels of sophistication, from primitive to advanced. And as described in this chapter and the next two chapters, we also find evidence of the same variety of tools in the Pleistocene, Pliocene, Miocene, and even as far back as the Eocene. The simplest explanation is that anatomically modern humans, who make such a spectrum of tools today, also made them in the past. One could also imagine that such humans coexisted with other more primitive humanlike creatures who also made stone tools.
|