Documente online.
Zona de administrare documente. Fisierele tale
Am uitat parola x Creaza cont nou
 HomeExploreaza
upload
Upload




Carbon - Good or Bad ?

physics


Carbon - Good or Bad ?

There's no real answer to the question of whether carbon is good or bad for a discus aquarium. It has been the subject of many flames and this page is here to provide some information about what carbon actually does.

It is a partial reprint of an article entitled "Myths of Aquarium Filtration and Water Chemistry". It first appeared in the 1995 issue of AQUARIUM USA, and is written by Timothy A. Hovanec, who has over 30 years of experience as an aquarist. He also has extensive professional expertise in aquatic system design, water quality research and aquaculture. He is currently the director of aquatic research for Marineland Aquarium Products and is a PhD candidate in biology at the University of California.




Myth No. 10 -- All granular activated carbons are the same.

There is a perception among hobbyists that all activated carbons are the same. Assuming this is true, one can simply shop for carbon by paying attention to price. Paradoxically, a smaller group of aquarists believes that the most expensive carbon is the best. Both of these assumptions are untrue.

There are four common base materials used to make activated carbon. These base materials are bituminous coal, lignite, peat, and coconut shells. Although these are listed here in order of most to least effective, even within a specific material group there can be differences.

Activated carbons made from bituminous coal are the most effective for aquarium water filtration. They contain a wide range of pore sizes and are thus able to remove a wide range of organic pollutants. The pore size is important because it determines the size of the organic compounds the carbon can remove.

A carbon can have a very large surface area, but that area can be mostly unusable if the organic compounds to be removed are too large to fit into the pores. This is the case with coconut shell carbon. The structure of coconut is such that the activated carbon it forms has a tremendous number of very small pores, while most of the organics in the water are larger than these pores and will not fit into them. This eliminates any benefit of a large amount of surface area.

Lignite coal produces carbons with the opposite problem from coconut carbons. Lignitel carbons have pores large enough for common organic molecules, but this results in a reduced total surface area. To remove the same amount of organics, a lot more lignite carbon must be used compared to bituminous coal carbon.

Do not buy a carbon just based on surface area claims. Read the label and determine the type of base material. If it is not listed, contact the manufacturer. Don't pay extra for pre-washed carbon or "marine-grade" carbons. There is no carbon specially made for saltwater. Any quality carbon will work in both freshwater and saltwater aquariums.

Price is no indicator of carbon quality. While better carbons are more expensive, the most expensive carbons are not necessarily worth the extra cost. Size is also not an indicator of effectiveness. A small-granule carbon does not have more surface area (more pores) than a large-granule carbon. The reason for this is that the internal pore surface area, not the external area of the granule, determines the total surface area. Smaller carbon will work faster than larger carbon, but will not remove any more pollutants.

All carbons should be rinsed well before being placed in the filter system. Keep an eye on the water for any yellowish tint that indicates that the carbon needs to be replaced.


Myth No. 11 -- Activated carbon removes benefical trace elements.

Many people do not use carbon because they beleive it will remove beneficial trace elements. It is true that activated carbon will remove certain trace elements under certain conditions. However, this statement is much different from the general proclimation that carbon removes trace elements, which implies all trace elements are removed in all conditions.

The ability of carbon to remove a particular trace element depends upon the pH of the water, the concentration of the element, whether the element is chelated or not, and the "state" of the element. Some elements exist in many forms (states) in water. Iron, for example, exists in either the ferric or ferrous state. Carbon does not adsorb iron in the ferrous state and only moderately in the ferric state.

The pH is important because it determines the solubility of the elements. Studies have shown that the pH must be below 4 or above 10 for carbon to adsorb many elements.

Table 1 shows the adsorption potential of many substances. While the chart is not definitive, it gives a good idea of the types of substances adsorbed by carbon.


TABLE 1
The Adsorbtion Potential of Various Substances by Activated Carbon

 

High to Very Good

Good to Moderate

Fair

Low to None

Antimony

Acetic Acid

Copper (if complexed)

Alkalinity

Arsenic

Cobalt

Iron (as Fe3+)

Ammonia

Bismuth

Detergents

Lead

Barium

Bleach

Hydrogen Sulfide

Nickel

Beryllium

Chloramines

Mercury

Titanium

Cadmium

Chlorine

Ozone

Vanadium

Carbon Dioxide

Chromium

Potassium Permanganate

Copper

Colors

Silver

Hardness

Dyes

Soap

Iron (as Fe2+)

Gold

Solvents

Lime

Hydrogen Peroxide

Vinegar

Manganese

Insecticides

Zirconium

Molybdenum

Monochloramine

Nitrates

Odors

Selenium

Pesticides

Tungsten

Phenols

Zinc

Tin

Trihalomethanes


Document Info


Accesari: 899
Apreciat: hand-up

Comenteaza documentul:

Nu esti inregistrat
Trebuie sa fii utilizator inregistrat pentru a putea comenta


Creaza cont nou

A fost util?

Daca documentul a fost util si crezi ca merita
sa adaugi un link catre el la tine in site


in pagina web a site-ului tau.




eCoduri.com - coduri postale, contabile, CAEN sau bancare

Politica de confidentialitate | Termenii si conditii de utilizare




Copyright © Contact (SCRIGROUP Int. 2024 )