THE NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR THE PREPARATION OF ROMANIA'S ACCESSION TO THE EUROPEAN UNION
Romania's accession to the European Union have
represented a fundamental strategic goal for the Romanian society. This option
is based on the convergence of political and social forces and aims at that
solid integration of the country into the European system of values, the
development of the Romanian society on the democratic and market economy
principles so as to assure the social stability and the prosperity of the citizens
and of the nation.
The accession
had to serve to the promotion of the national interest and to the development
of the economic potential and of the Romanian cultural heritage, thus becoming
an essential element of the national solidarity.
After the 1989
Revolution, the integration of Romania
into the European and Euro-Atlantic structures (by joining the E.U. and
N.A.T.O.) represented a major, steady and long-term objective of Romania's
domestic and foreign policy.
This objective
has been the task of all the governments in Bucharest, for the last 15 years and it has a
landslide support of public opinion, of the political and intellectual elite,
of all the political parties. All parties, syndicates, cults, non-government
organizations agree 333b17d d to keep up Romania's
European integration process, signing the National Strategy of the Accession to
the E.U., in 1995. Today, neither political party, nor non-governmental
organization asserts itself against European integration (unlike other
countries). Public surveys confirm that 80% of the Romanians highly uphold the
idea of European integration, desiring a Western living standard.
Nevertheless,
this truth is arguable. Most Romanians support European integration without any
knowledge of actual costs of the integration or understanding of the complexity
of the fact. The 2007 accession impact will reduce the number of the European
integration followers, as it happened in the neighbouring countries which
became part of the European Union starting May 1st, 2004 (Hungary, Poland and
so on). Only one party, the “Romania Mare” Party („Greater Romania” Party), considered nationalist and
extremist, has seldom criticized the European integration, with no overt
rejection. After 1995, this party was isolated in the political panorama and
has always been kept back in the opposition; all parties discarded alliance
with it, truthfully in the perspective of the European integration.
All the
governments in Bucharest since 1989 have claimed
“Romania's
integration in the European and Euro-Atlantic structures” and embraced reforms
necessary to a transition to democracy and free market. Among these
governments, some proved a lesser political determination or a less significant
administrative capability to put into practice unpopular, radical reforms. No
“shock therapy” was employed. Straightforwardly, the “communist legacy” was
more profound here rather than in other countries. In Romania,
Ceausescu's hard-line, totalitarian, neo-Stalinist regime was more
aggressive with no consent for either opposition or “civilian society”, and
after 1980, he isolated the country in a much greater degree than other
communist countries, depriving the population of basic goods. Romania was officially rated as “a developing
country”, following other communist countries, such as Czechoslovakia and Hungary, classified as
“medium-developed countries”. Romanian economy was more centralized and lagging
behind, as private enterprise was forbidden (unlike Hungary
where the communist regime allowed the activity of small private companies, or
in Poland,
where the peasants kept the possession of undersized properties).1 This heavy burden was followed, after
1989, by a too sluggish accomplishment of the required reforms, in an
environment of poverty, corruption, undue and wasteful bureaucracy, in
compliance with the laws, former hard-liner mentalities, the revolts of the
miners and so forth. These particulars also mentioned in the regular reports of
the European Commission ranked Romania
last among the East-European candidate countries to enter the European Union,
however, without excluding it. Hindered and postponed, Romania
continued its way to the European Union notwithstanding.
In 1993, Romania entered
the Council of Europe and allowed the latter's monitoring. The European Court for
Human Rights imposes several decisions on human rights observance. The
Parliament of the European Union includes Romanian members too.
The November
2002 Prague NATO Summit invited Romania
to join the Alliance.
Since April 2, 2004, Romania
has been a full member of NATO and has continued to actively participate in the
military operations in Iraq,
Afghanistan
and Kossovo.
The December
1999 Helsinki European Council decided to start
the EU integration talks with Romania
and other East-European countries. Ten candidate countries have joined
factually since May 1, 2004 while Romania succeeded to close the
integration negotiations. On April 25, 2005, Romania
and Bulgaria
conjointly signed the Treaty of Accession and will join the EU on January 1,
2007, providing they meet all the assignments required during negotiations.
Having signed the Treaty of Accession, Romania will send its
representatives as observers in all EU institutions (EU Parliament, Council of
Ministers, European Council).
For several
years the President and the Prime Minister of Romania have already participated
in the European Council meetings. During the debates on the “Project of Treaty
Establishing a Constitution for Europe” held by the European Convention,
Romanian Government representative, Minister Hildegard Puwak and Parliament
member Adrian Severin partook assertively. Romanian President, Ion Iliescu
signed the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe on October 29, 2004,
which will be validated by the signing countries in the following 2 years,
including Romania as well.
Our society is
tormented by several questions regarding the European integration: Is Romania a European country or not?
By this European integration wouldn’t the Romanians lose their national
identity? Why is Romania
kept outside the doors of Europe until 2007?
Which are the requirements to be met for Romania to join the EU? Which are
the benefits, and the costs as well, of Romania’s
integration in the EU?
1. Is Romania a European country or not?
Geographically,
historically and culturally, Romania
belongs to Europe. On the contrary, it does
not belong to the EU and Western capitalist civilization. Conventionally, the
geographic concept of Europe comprises the area between the Atlantic Ocean and
the Ural Mountains. The historical concept of Europe consists in the historical sphere of the evolution
of the human society which had created the present European civilization. The
cultural concept of Europe defines a European
culture of unity in diversity, founded on the collective historical heritage of
the Greek culture, Roman civilization and Jewish-Christian spirituality, modern
Parliamentarian democracy, contemporary science and technique, as revealed by
the philosopher Andrei Marga.2 Eventually, the institutional concept
of Europe refers to the European Union (EU).
2. By this European integration
wouldn’t the Romanians lose their national identity?
The European
Union does not aim at either subduing the national states or suppressing the
national identity of a state. It is an overt truth, that although integrated in
the EU, the French are nonetheless French as well as the Dutch or Greeks. The
EU did not impose an official language; all the 25 languages of the member
states are official in the same manner: English, French, German, Spanish,
Polish, Czech, Greek, Hungarian etc. Certainly, English and French, as
universal convention languages are mainly employed in the EU institutions. In
the voting system recognized in the European institutions, no predominance of a
great power over smaller states or of 2 or 3 great powers is allowed. Luxembourg or Portugal
well represented in the European institutions do not
sense any domination of Germany,
France or Great Britain.
The European Commission was also headed by Presidents from smaller countries
such as Luxembourg (Jaques
Santér – former Prime Minister) or Portugal (Jose Barroso – former
Prime Minister). EU is a unity in diversity, a very pluralistic community.
As a result, in
a future integrated Europe, no one will oblige the Romanians, the European
Hungarians or Germans to give up on their language, religion, customs,
particular culture, or national identity. The EU needs European Romanians and
European Hungarians, no some European from nowhere. The EU does not resemble
the Soviet Union or the USA.
3. Then why the European Union voted Romania’s
accession as far as 2007?
First of all,
the European Union is a customs union and a single European market, with free
movement of persons, of goods, of capitals, and freedom to provide services as
well. Including Romania
will compel it to suppress import customs taxes, uncovering itself to a free
competition with the powerful Western economy. The feeble Romanian economy
would very soon collapse and the people would become unemployed. It would also
be a disaster for Romania,
as well as for the Western world, because, under such conditions, the Romanians
might lack purchasing capabilities for Western goods. On the other hand, the
free movement of persons may allow settling down and working without restraint
in Germany, France, England,
Spain, Italy, where
the living standard is much higher. But then, how many young persons would
remain in Romania?
Therefore, this
is why Romania
may not join the EU only after becoming compatible with its economic
development level and living standard. Before Romania
enters Europe, Europe must come
to Romania and we have to
bring Europe home. This is a matter of
civilization (a developed capitalist economy, democracy, a Western-style
justice), not a favourable vote on the part of the EU. Joining NATO is much
easier as this is a political subject of a vote, of a political and military
alliance. The issue of Romania’s
joining the EU is that of a social and economical capitalist development
according to Western patterns and
this has to be done for the interest of Romania
and not of Europe. By means of this approach,
the national idea is perfectly harmonized with the European one. We have to be fully compatible and competitive
in a European fashion. Yet
again, if we bring Europe home, we will be able to enter Europe.
Which are the requirements
to be met for Romania
to join the EU?
In order to
enter the EU, Romania,
as well as all the other countries, has to apply the same conventions and
standards already applicable in the member states. These regulations were
reasserted and defined once more by the European Council in Copenhagen, in June 1993, identified as the
Copenhagen Criteria for Membership. Romania and all the candidate
countries have to fulfil the Copenhagen Criteria for Membership: Political
Criteria, Economic Criteria and Ability to assume the obligations of membership.
5.Which are the benefits, and the costs as well, of Romania’s
accession to the EU?
After accession,
Romanian citizens will enjoy both the benefits and the costs implied in the
single European market, the free movement of individuals, goods, services and
capital, as well as the shared policies of the European Union. Moreover, they
will automatically become European citizens with full rights. European
citizenship is conditioned by the national one and rounds it out, adding new
rights:
- the right to freely move and settle down in one of the
member states;
- the right to vote and become eligible in the residence
state, in European and local elections, under certain conditions;
- the right to address a petition to the European Parliament;
- the right to address a formal request to the European
Council on the faulty performance of communitarian institutions;
- personal protection offered by the embassies and consulates
of any member state, on the territory of a non-EU state.
1) More
substantially, the Romanian market will merge with the German, Italian, French
ones, already joined in the single European market. It will have to face the
contest with German, Italian, French, British companies, to become competitive.
The products made in Romania
will have to meet the standards of European quality.These requirements
are convoluted for Romanian small companies and some of them will face
bankruptcy. The consumer
will buy goods of European quality, but at high, European prices. We will be
able to buy Western cars and other goods, from their countries of origin, and
bring them home with no customs taxes. Good quality Western products will
invade the Romanian market, without customs duty, competing with Romanian
companies. Romanian goods will freely sell in Western countries, duty free, but
meeting European quality standards. Businesses will freely develop in Western
countries, including services (taxi and hotel ones), trade and industry, but
the question is whether we own the economic command for this. “Not all accessions
lead to benefits”. There will be “winners and losers of the European
integration process” points out Romanian liberal economist Daniel Daianu
(former Minister of Finance). “Integration can not substitute a strategy for
economic development”.
2) Prices will
rise and will reach those from Western countries. The Romanian public found out
the accession of Hungary
on May 1 2004, lead to a severe price raise of foodstuff, causing a major
discontent of the population and the fall of the government led by Megyessi.
The living standard of the Romanian will also have to rise together with the
economic advance. Romania
will become a country and society as capitalist and democratic as any Western
one.
3) Compliance to
human right regulations and laws as those in the Western countries will be
granted in the EU. Democracy, administrative and judicial proficiency, obeying
the rights of minorities will be consolidated in Romania.
4) As Romanian
and European citizens, we will be able to travel freely in the 27 countries of
EU, as from one local county to another, with an infrequent check of passports.
We will be able to live in Rome, Barcelona, Lisbon or Brussels…, to work there
under equal conditions, legally, to run businesses, to benefit from medical
assistance, unemployment aid and social protection.
5) If we live in
Rome, we can vote in the local elections for the
mayor of councillors of Rome.
We can also run for the position of the mayor of Rome or any local councillor. There is the
possibility to run even for a European Parliamentarian seat. But we won’t be
allowed to run for or elect an Italian Parliament member. Obviously, remaining
in their own country, Romanian citizens will be able to vote and run for
European Parliament seats as well as for national and local positions.
6) We will have
the right to address a petition to the European Parliament, irrespective of the
residence (Romania
or any Western country).
7) We will be
allowed to address complaints to the European Ombudsman on faulty performance
of European institution, no matter where we live.
8) If we go to a
country outside the EU, where Romania
does not have either Embassy or Consulate, we can benefit from protection from
a diplomatic representative of any EU member state represented there.
9) Our
University diplomas and vocational credentials will be recognized in all 27 EU
member states. For example a student may study one semester in
Targu-Mures, then a semester in Lisbon, another one in Brussels, and
another in Berlin, all exams being accepted by the manageable credit system, or
benefiting from a EU Eramus scholarship. However, to reach this stage, our
education system will have to undergo reforms leading to a European
compatibility and even standards.
10) Also, in Romania,
developing regions will be founded on economic criteria, to attract EU
structural funds, set up to perform a more proficient administration, but also
to acquaint the citizen to the decision-making practice. Their organization
will lie on the economic cohesion criterion, taking into account several
cultural and regional identities. Since 1998, 8 developing regions have been
constituted, in a promising manner, and will be upheld until 2011. According to
the Accession Treaty, as far as 2011, the Romanian Government will decide upon
the manner of reorganizing and consolidating these regions. There is no unique
European pattern of organizing such regions and each European country had its
own approach. EU does not impose any example of organizing such areas. The
Romanian Government will follow the experience of one or another Western state
and will confer with home social partners and will make a decision in conformity
with local and national interests.
11) In exchange,
the European Romania will get to enjoy peace, prosperity, territorial
integrity, keeping its present borders, sovereignty, just like all other member
states of EU.
12) Voluntarily,
like all other member states, Romania
will restrict its national sovereignty, delivering a fraction of its
sovereignty features, to overnational institutions (European Commission,
European Court of Justice). On its part, Romania will have its
representatives in these institutions, which have to observe the interest of EU
in its whole, fusing the common interest of all member states. Romania will be
fairly represented in all EU institutions, participating in the European
decision making, enhancing its influence and prestige all over the world. The
Romanian language will become one of the official ones in EU (along with
English, French, German, Spanish, Greek, Estonian, Hungarian, Bulgarian…), and
the important documents of the EU will also be translated into Romanian.
13) Romania will be
a full and equal right member in the leadership of the EU. It will have an
advantage over other states as in some EU institutions states are represented
proportionally to their population. Among the 27 member states, Romania will
rank 7 as population (22 million inhabitants) and will also rank 7 as number of
representatives in the European Parliament, in Committee of the Regions, in the
Economic and Social Committee, as number of votes in the Council of Ministers
of EU. Romania will be better
represented rather then other 20 states, among which: Hungary, Bulgaria,
Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania,
The Czech Republic, Slovakia,
Slovenia, Malta, Cypruss, Belgium, Holland,
Luxemburg, Denmark,
Ireland, Greece, and Portugal.
In the EU
institutions, Romania
has:
1. in the
European Parliament – 35 Euro-parliamentarians out of 785, elected by us
through universal, equal direct and secret ballot11 ;
2. in the European Council – 1 member out of 27 (the President
of Romania or the Romanian Prime Minister);
3. in the
Council of Ministers of the EU – 14 votes out of 345, resulting 5,49% of the
total necessary voted to reach a decision of qualified majority and 15,38% of
the votes necessary to obstruct any decision;
4. in the
European Commission – 1 Romanian European Commissioner out of 27;
5. in the Court
of Justice of EU – 1 Judge;
6. in the Court
of First Instance – 1 Judge;
7. in the
Economic and Social Committee – 15 members of 344;
8. in the
Committee of the Regions – 15 members of 344,
9. in the Court of Auditors – 1 member out of 27; .
In addition, Romania will
hold the Presidency of the EU in 2019 (in the second semester July-December).
This was decided by the member states on December 13, 2004, while approving the
listing of EU Presidents till 2020. According to the Treaty Establishing a
Constitution for Europe, starting since 2007,
the Presidency of the Council will be held by three cooperating states, but
each of them will have an ongoing half a year to preside the affairs of the EU.
Romania will be part of the
9th Presidency of the Council including Austria
(President in the first semester, January-June 2019), Romania (President in the second semester,
July-December 1919) and Finland
(January-June 2020). Naturally, Romania
is the latest of the new members holding the Presidency of the EU Council,
after Bulgaria
(July-December 2018), Estonia
(January-June 2018), and Hungary
(January-June 2011).13
The Treaty of
Accession
The Treaty of
Accession of Bulgaria and Romania
to the European Union” was signed on April 25, 2005 in Luxemburg,
after the approval of the European Commission (February 22, 2005), by the
European Parliament (in April 13), and by EU Council (in April 25, 2005). The
Treaty must by ratified by Member States (EU-25), by Romania and Bulgaria, in the period 2005-2006
and will be valid since January 1, 2007.
The Treaty of
Accession of Romania to the European Union is the same with that of Bulgaria and is
the obvious results of the negotiation process of the 31 chapters. The treaty
was issued with the same principles and methods as those used in the layout of
the Accession Treaty of the ten member states (effectively joint in May 1,
2004).
Unlike the ten
member states which acceded in May 1, 2004, Romania
and Bulgaria will joint the
Accession Treaty and the Treaty establishing the Constitution for Europe, if it
will be ratified by all member states up to the effective accession of Romania and
Bulgarian. In this approach, The Treaty of Accession of Romania and Bulgaria must
include the necessary changes to the Constitutive Treaty of the European
Comunity. Thus, anAct of Accession and
a Protocol of Accession were also prepared. .
The Act of
Accession contains “the conditions of accession of the Republic
of Bulgaria and Romania and the
adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded”. The
Protocol of Ascension (“Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for
admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania
to the European Union”) adjusts The Constitutional Treaty and makes way to the
accession of Romania and Bulgaria to
this document. In principle, the Act and Protocol have identical contents (the
difference resides in the texts from the European Constitution, the
Constitional Treaty of the European Community and the Treaty on the European
Union.
The Act and the
Protocol will become valid alternatively, according to the acceptance of the
Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe.
If the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe will be valid before the
accession of Romania and Bulgaria
(January 1, 2007), the Protocol of Accession will automatically be valid. But
if the Constitutional Treaty will be valid after the accession of Romania and Bulgaria, in that moment, the Act
of Accession will become valid together with the Constitutional Treaty, the
former becoming null and the Protocol will create judicial effects19 .
The official
name of the Accession Treaty is the “Treaty between the Kingdom of Belgium, the
Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the
Republic of Estonia, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French
Republic, Ireland, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic
of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the
Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the
Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the
Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom
of Sweden, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Member
States of the European Union) and the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania,
concerning the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the
European Union”.20
The Treaty of
Accession of Romania and Bulgaria
to European Union comprises:
v General parts: The Treaty itself, the Act of
Accession/ the Protocol of Accession;
v Appendices: agreed measure during
negotiations – permanent and temporary measures;
v Declarations.
Unlike the
treaty of the ten member states, the treaty with Romania
and Bulgaria
does not have the technical adjustment to the acquis communautaire in the
appendices, considering the wider period of time between the signing of the
treaty and the actual accession. The technical adjustments were issued in the
same time with the Treaty and were politically decided on February 11, 2005 (in
the same time with the political agreement of the text in English) and will be
adopted by documents of communitarian institutions, the Council and the
Commission, respectively21
General Parts
1. The Treaty of
Accession itself (comprising six
articles) support the accession of Romania
and Bulgaria to the European
Union, as well as the fact that by ascending, the two states become part of the
Constitution Treaty for Europe, in the
conditions settled by the appended Protocol to this Treaty. The Treaty
comprises a clause on an alternative validation of the Accession Act and of the
Accession Protocol.
Also, the date
when the Treaty of Accession will be valid, as well as the fact that this will
be ratified by the signing sides according to internal procedures is
established. The ratification instruments will be presented till December 31,
2006.
According to the
final clause, if one of the two states does present the ratification
instruments to this date, the Treaty will become valid for the other state and
the Council will then adopt the necessary adjustments for the Protocol of
Accession or the Act of Accession, as required.
The Act of
Accession / Protocol of Accession contain:
Part I – The Principles;
Part II – General Provisions: elements of
adjusting Treaties / Constitution;
Part III – Permanent Provisions (mainly to adjust
the acquis);
Part IV – Temporary Provisions (transition
periods);
Part V – Provisions for Implementing the Act.
2. Part I
(Principles) comprises the
definitions and provisions for Romania
and Bulgaria
of the compelling character of the fundamental treatises and acts adopted by
the communitarian institutions and the Central European Bank, previous to their
accession to the EU. The accomplishment of the recommendations of the original
treaties and the documents of the institutions are subject to the issues agreed
on during negotiations with each candidate state. The obligation of the two new
member states to join the conventions and agreements closed by the member
states is pointed out as well as the recognition of the Schengen acquis. The
list of the conventions closed by the member states is appended to the
Act/Protocol. Romania and Bulgaria are
compelled to modify them, till their accession, as well as the treaties closed
with third party states which are incompatible to the communitarian right.
Contrarily, these treaties will become void.22 .
The fact that
the EU will adapt its quantitative reststrictions to steel and steel products
in the relationship to third party countries is also provisioned, according to
the imports of Romania and Bulgaria.
The quantitative
restrictions applied to the imports of EU textile and clothing will also be
adapted taking into consideration the accession of Romania
and Bulgaria.
As far as the
bilateral agreements on fishing closed between Romania
and Bulgaria
is concerned, these will be managed by the EU.
Romania and Bulgaria will
be members of the EU starting the date of their accession and will considered
states where the unique currency will be adopted, at will, according to the
Article 122 of the Treaty on the Constitution of the European Common Market.
3. Part II comprises the institutional provisions, the
participation of Romania and
Bulgaria to the EU
institutions, respectively: Romania
will have 35 seats in the European
Parliament, between 2007 and 2009. After this date, the number of seats in the
European Parliament will be decided by European Council. Romania will
have 14 votes in the Council EU.
Romania may have 1
judge in the Court of Justice of EU and 1 seat in the Emergency Tribunal. The
mandate lasts six years. Alternatively, every three years, thirteen or fourteen
judges will be changes.
Romania will have 15
members in the Economic and Social Committee and 15in the Committee of the
Regions.
Romania has the right
to appoint members in the Directory Committee of the European Bank of Investments,
as well as in the Scientific and Technical Board according to EURATOM.
It is also
stated that Romanian and Bulgarian languages will become official in the EU23 .
4. Part III (Permanent provisions) stipulates the
recognition of the negotiated permanent measures (presented in
an addenda) as well as the indication to the instrument of how the
technical adjustments of the acquis should be accomplished till October 1, 2004
(„cut-off date”). The issue stands for the closed documents between the
institutions of the EU in different areas which are to be adopted having in
view their application both in Romania
and Bulgaria.
Among them, the following are worth mentioning: the labelling of electric and
electronic appliances, the list of plant and animal species protected in
Romania, qualifications and the list of liberal professions as well as the
institutions issuing diplomas in the area of interest, the record of
border-crossing locations, the register of international airports, the
catalogue of dangerous chemical products, the translation into Romanian of all
the speciality terms in different domains (for instance incorporated companies,
limited liability companies, companies of partial administration, road taxes,
highways, national, regional and local roads and so on), the list of countries
Romania requests entrance visas and their classification, the directory of
Romanian institutions participating in public acquisitions .
5. Part IV (Temporary provision) refers to
Transitional measures agreed on during negotiations (contained in the addenda), temporary institutional and financial provisions .
According to the temporary institutional provisions,
Romania
will have 35 seats in the European Parliament between the effective accession
to the EU and the date of the elections for the (2009). Romania has to
organize elections for the European Parliament “no later than December 31,
2007”. This means that Romania
may organize these elections anytime before December 31 2007, including the
interval between the signing of the Treaty of Accession, April 25 2005 and the
date of actual accession.
In the premise
in which the European Constitution will be valid till 2007, the “Nisa” voting
system will be maintained until 2009, Romania having 14 votes, as well as
the number of 15 seats in the Economic and Social Committee of the Regions26 .
According to the temporary financial provisions,
Romania
will contribute to the enlisted capital of the European Bank for Investments
with 42.3 million Euros. Romania’s
contribution to the Research Fund for Coal and Steel is of 29.88 million Euros.
Moreover, during
the transition period, Romania
will benefit from the Schengen facility aiming at the financing of the actions
taken along the outer border to implement some rules of the Schengen acquis as
well as the Cash-Flow Facility, targeting at their improvement. The funds for Romania will
be:
297.2 million Euros in 2007
131.8 million Euros in 2008
130.8 million Euros in 2009.
The management
of these funds is attributed to implementation agencies as pre-accession
assistance, through programs such as PHARE, PHARE– CBC (Cross-border
cooperation), ISPA, SAPARD and the Facility for the transition period.
The sum total
for structural actions for Romania
in the period 2007-2009 will be:
1,399 million Euros in 2007
1,972 million Euros in 2008
2,603 million Euros in 2009.
Part IV
comprises the safeguarding
clauses too .
As in the case
of the 10 new member states, the Treaty contains general clauses of
safeguarging:
General Safeguarding Clause
In the case of
serious and long-lasting difficulties will occur up to three years since the
accession, in the economic domain which might worsen the situation in a certain
field, Romania or Bulgaria may
require from the Commission an authorization for a series of protective
measures to improve the situation and adjust that economic domain of the Common
Market. Under similar circumstances, any full-right member state may take
protective measures in view of either or both member states.
The Safeguard Clause of Internal Market
If in the first
three years since the accession, Romania
and Bulgaria
do not meet the requirements established by negotiations endangering the
functioning of the Internal Market, the European Commission, willingly or at
the request of t member state, may take the necessary measures to remedy such a
situation. This clause may be invoked even before the date of the accession of
the two states.
The Safeguard Clause for Justice and Home Affairs
If there are
delay in the fulfilling or implementing the communitarian provisions of mutual
recognition in civil and penal justice in Romania and Bulgaria, the Commission
may, willingly or at the request of a member state, to take the necessary
measures and specify the working conditions of such measures, till the elapsing
of three years since the Treaty became valid. These measures must be
substantiated and maintained no more than it is strictly necessary till the
situation is solved. Unlike in the case of the ten candidate states, for
Romania and Bulgaria, a clause
of delay of the accession may
be applied, by a unanimous vote, at the recommendation of the Committee, the
Council can make the decision to postpone the date of accession by one year,
till January 1, 2008, after the monitoring on the part of the Commission of the
level of readiness and implementation of the acquis on the part of the two
countries and if the preparedness proves insufficient for them to become
members of EU.
Moreover, in the
case of Romania,
the Council may decide, by a majority vote to
postpone the accession by one year, till January 1, 2008, if an
insufficient preparedness is noticed in the field of justice and internal affairs and in the domain of competition (there are 11 obligations
mentioned in an addenda).
The temporary
provisions stipulate the possibility for Romania
and Bulgaria
to take transitory measures to ease the achievement of a new common
agricultural policy as well
as to apply communitarian
measures in the veterinary domain, plant and animal health and safety of
foodstuff.
6. Part V (Provisions regarding institutional
adjustments) contains the requirements on institutional adjustments necessary
after the accession of Romania and Bulgaria (Title I), the means of
applications of communitarian institution documents to Bulgaria and Romania
(Title II) and the final provisions (Title III).
Title I
comprises the requirements necessary to adjust the procedure rules by the
communitarian institutions (The European Council, the Court of Justice of EU). Romania and Bulgaria will appoint, in turn, a
member of the European Commission, on the date of accession, whose mandate will
expire after the mandates of all the other members of the Commission have
expired. Romanian and Bulgarian commissioners will be appointed by the Council
in agreement to the European Parliament. Thus, unlike the treaty with the other
ten states, in the case of the appointment of the new commissioners, the
agreement of the European Parliament will be required to ensure a better
openness of the decisions. Likewise, Romania
and Bulgaria
will appoint, in turn, a judge in the Court of Justice of the EU and in the
General Court. The mandate of the former will expire in 2006, of the latter in
2012, decision taken by random choice. Romania
and Bulgaria
will appoint members for the European Court of Auditors, Economic and Social
Committee and in the Committee of Regions29 .
Title II requires the obligations on the part of Romania and Bulgaria to agree to all the
necessary measures and to conform to all directives and decisions of
institutions, to all decisions made by institutions, to all communicates of the
member states, since the date of accession. These measures also include the
obligation to change the necessary internal legislation. Also, Romania and Bulgaria will receive a number of
measures (such as those referring to the protection of workers under radiation
environment) .
The mechanism of
technical adjustments is also stipulated for the acquis to be accepted after
“cut-off date” (October 1, 2004), which were not in
the Treaty of Accession. A Council or Commission will have to adopt them (in
accordance with the institution issuing the document) at the request of Romania or Bulgaria no later than the date of
accession. Unlike the case of the treaty with the other ten states, a request
was added to take the necessary steps to change their domestic legislation,
where such changes were generated by the adoption of communitarian documents as
a result or Romania’s and Bulgaria’s accession.
Title III accomplishes the conveying to Romania and Bulgaria of certificate copies of
several juridical instruments: the Treaty of the Constitution of the EU, the
Treaty of the European Union as well as international treaties held in the
archives of the General Secretariat of the Council.
The Declarations
To
the Accession Treaty a series of
political declarations were appended, with no juridical effect: the Joint
Declaration by the present Member States (EU-25) on the free movement of
workers; Joint Declaration by the present Member States and the Commission on
Bulgaria's and Romania's preparations for accession; Joint Declaration by the
Federal Republic of Germany and the Republic of Austria on the free movement of
workers; Declaration by the Republic of Bulgaria on the use of the Cyrillic
alphabet in the European Union. Also, an “Exchange of Letters between the
European Union and the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania on an information and
consultation procedure for the adoption of certain decisions and other measures
to be taken during the period preceding accession” is annexed.
By the
Declaration on the free movement of workers, the Member States express their
will to improve the access of Romanian citizens to the job market, in order to
speed up the provisions of the communitarian acquis.
The Joint
Declaration by the present Member States and the Commission on Bulgaria's and
Romania's preparations for accession asserts that the EU will continue the
strict monitoring of the meeting of all requirements mentioned during
negotiations, attention being paid to the fields of justice and domestic
affairs, competition and environment. The declaration contains the same
elements declared in the Conclusions of the Council of the EU on December 17,
2004.
In the Joint
Declarations of the present Member States (EU-25) on rural development possible
funds are estimated for this domain in Romania (2,308 million Euros).
Romania has accepted the declarations
recommended by the member states and did not require extra declarations as
other states of the ten did, for instance for a free movement of individuals or
a safeguard clause as the provisions of the Treaty are obvious in these fields
and are equivocal31 .
Finally, Romania
and Bulgaria
became members of the EU in January 2007.